You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
土砂・シルトを含んだ津波の波力に関する実験的研究
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B2 (Coastal Engineering), January 2020
|
DOI | 10.2208/kaigan.76.2_i_385 |
Authors |
木瀬 晃周, 有川 太郎 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,433,608
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B2 (Coastal Engineering)
#3
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,801
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B2 (Coastal Engineering)
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them