↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive and neural consequences of memory suppression in major depressive disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive and neural consequences of memory suppression in major depressive disorder
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13415-016-0464-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew D. Sacchet, Benjamin J. Levy, J. Paul Hamilton, Arkadiy Maksimovskiy, Paula T. Hertel, Jutta Joormann, Michael C. Anderson, Anthony D. Wagner, Ian H. Gotlib

Abstract

Negative biases in cognition have been documented consistently in major depressive disorder (MDD), including difficulties in the ability to control the processing of negative material. Although negative information-processing biases have been studied using both behavioral and neuroimaging paradigms, relatively little research has been conducted examining the difficulties of depressed persons with inhibiting the retrieval of negative information from long-term memory. In this study, we used the think/no-think paradigm and functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the cognitive and neural consequences of memory suppression in individuals diagnosed with depression and in healthy controls. The participants showed typical behavioral forgetting effects, but contrary to our hypotheses, there were no differences between the depressed and nondepressed participants or between neutral and negative memories. Relative to controls, depressed individuals exhibited greater activity in right middle frontal gyrus during memory suppression, regardless of the valence of the suppressed stimuli, and differential activity in the amygdala and hippocampus during memory suppression involving negatively valenced stimuli. These findings indicate that depressed individuals are characterized by neural anomalies during the suppression of long-term memories, increasing our understanding of the brain bases of negative cognitive biases in MDD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 23%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 12 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 34 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 38%
Neuroscience 20 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 37 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#500
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,426
of 327,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.