↓ Skip to main content

History of childhood sexual abuse and risk of prenatal and postpartum depression or depressive symptoms: an epidemiologic review

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
History of childhood sexual abuse and risk of prenatal and postpartum depression or depressive symptoms: an epidemiologic review
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00737-015-0533-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adaeze C. Wosu, Bizu Gelaye, Michelle A. Williams

Abstract

The objective of this review is to summarize the literature (and to the extent possible, report the magnitude and direction of the association) concerning history of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and depression or depressive symptoms among pregnant and postpartum women. Publications were identified through literature searches of seven databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PyscINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, BIOSIS, and Science Direct) using keywords including "child abuse," "depression," "pregnancy," "prenatal," "pregnancy," and "postpartum." The literature search yielded seven eligible studies on the prenatal period and another seven studies on the postpartum period. All but one prenatal study observed statistically significant positive associations of CSA with depression or depressive symptoms during pregnancy. Findings on the association of CSA with postpartum depression or depressive symptoms were inconsistent; pooled unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were 1.82 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.92, 3.60) and 1.20 (95 % CI 0.81, 1.76). In sum, findings suggest a positive association of history of CSA with depression and depressive symptoms in the prenatal period. Findings on the postpartum period were inconsistent. Clinical and public health implications of evidence from the available literature are discussed, as are desirable study design characteristics of future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 193 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 59 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 18%
Psychology 33 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Social Sciences 14 7%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 69 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,384,989
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#707
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,425
of 263,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.