You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early experience with laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Surgery, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/bjs.9063 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. A. Swank, I. M. Mulder, A. G. M. Hoofwijk, S. W. Nienhuijs, J. F. Lange, W. A. Bemelman, on behalf of the Dutch Diverticular Disease Collaborative Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sudan | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 25 | 35% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,120,836
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#4,815
of 6,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,018
of 301,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#22
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.