You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
LOFAR detections of low-frequency radio recombination lines towards Cassiopeia A
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Astronomy and Astrophysics, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1051/0004-6361/201221001 |
| Authors |
A. Asgekar, J. B. R. Oonk, S. Yatawatta, R. J. van Weeren, J. P. McKean, G. White, N. Jackson, J. Anderson, I. M. Avruch, F. Batejat, R. Beck, M. E. Bell, M. R. Bell, I. van Bemmel, M. J. Bentum, G. Bernardi, P. Best, L. Bîrzan, A. Bonafede, R. Braun, F. Breitling, R. H. van de Brink, J. Broderick, W. N. Brouw, M. Brüggen, H. R. Butcher, W. van Cappellen, B. Ciardi, J. E. Conway, F. de Gasperin, E. de Geus, A. de Jong, M. de Vos, S. Duscha, J. Eislöffel, H. Falcke, R. A. Fallows, C. Ferrari, W. Frieswijk, M. A. Garrett, J.-M. Grießmeier, T. Grit, A. W. Gunst, T. E. Hassall, G. Heald, J. W. T. Hessels, M. Hoeft, M. Iacobelli, H. Intema, E. Juette, A. Karastergiou, J. Kohler, V. I. Kondratiev, M. Kuniyoshi, G. Kuper, C. Law, J. van Leeuwen, P. Maat, G. Macario, G. Mann, S. Markoff, D. McKay-Bukowski, M. Mevius, J. C. A. Miller-Jones, J. D. Mol, R. Morganti, D. D. Mulcahy, H. Munk, M. J. Norden, E. Orru, H. Paas, M. Pandey-Pommier, V. N. Pandey, R. Pizzo, A. G. Polatidis, W. Reich, H. Röttgering, B. Scheers, A. Schoenmakers, J. Sluman, O. Smirnov, C. Sobey, M. Steinmetz, M. Tagger, Y. Tang, C. Tasse, R. Vermeulen, C. Vocks, R. A. M. J. Wijers, M. W. Wise, O. Wucknitz, P. Zarka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 4 | 27% |
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 73% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2013.
All research outputs
#4,618,238
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Astronomy and Astrophysics
#7,003
of 25,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,419
of 205,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Astronomy and Astrophysics
#29
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.