↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis of Elbow Fracture Patterns on Radiographs: Interobserver Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis of Elbow Fracture Patterns on Radiographs: Interobserver Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2742-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Job N. Doornberg, Thierry G. Guitton, David Ring, Science of Variation Group

Abstract

Studies of traumatic elbow instability suggest that recognition of a pattern in the combination and character of the fractures and joint displacements helps predict soft tissue injury and guide the treatment of traumatic elbow instability, but there is no evidence that patterns can be identified reliably.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2013.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,739
of 7,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,405
of 288,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#116
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.