You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: Successful and Failed Strict Rate Control Against a Background of Lenient Rate Control Data From RACE II (Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation)
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.038 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hessel F. Groenveld, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Harry J.G.M. Crijns, Maarten P. Van den Berg, Hans L. Hillege, Marco Alings, Dirk J. Van Veldhuisen, Isabelle C. Van Gelder, RACE II Investigators |
Abstract |
This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with successful strict, failed strict, and lenient rate control. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 101 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
Other | 13 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
Other | 22 | 21% |
Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 58% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,808,821
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#9,449
of 16,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,943
of 291,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#95
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.