↓ Skip to main content

Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: Successful and Failed Strict Rate Control Against a Background of Lenient Rate Control Data From RACE II (Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent…

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: Successful and Failed Strict Rate Control Against a Background of Lenient Rate Control Data From RACE II (Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation)
Published in
JACC, February 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.038
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hessel F. Groenveld, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Harry J.G.M. Crijns, Maarten P. Van den Berg, Hans L. Hillege, Marco Alings, Dirk J. Van Veldhuisen, Isabelle C. Van Gelder, RACE II Investigators

Abstract

This study sought to investigate differences in outcome between patients treated with successful strict, failed strict, and lenient rate control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 101 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Other 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,808,821
of 25,450,869 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#9,449
of 16,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,943
of 291,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#95
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,450,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.