You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Systematic Review of Web-Based Interventions for Patient Empowerment and Physical Activity in Chronic Diseases: Relevance for Cancer Survivors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2196/jmir.2281 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wilma Kuijpers, Wim G Groen, Neil K Aaronson, Wim H van Harten |
| Abstract |
Patient empowerment reflects the ability of patients to positively influence their health and health behavior such as physical activity. While interactive Web-based interventions are increasingly used in various chronic disease settings to enhance empowerment and physical activity, such interventions are still uncommon for cancer survivors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 14% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 19% |
| Scientists | 6 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 724 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 703 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 118 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 111 | 15% |
| Researcher | 103 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 6% |
| Other | 136 | 19% |
| Unknown | 145 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 152 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 113 | 16% |
| Psychology | 90 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 53 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 111 | 15% |
| Unknown | 176 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,147,022
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#860
of 7,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,211
of 204,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#8
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.