You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Esophageal Sphincter Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1205544 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert A Ganz, Jeffrey H Peters, Santiago Horgan, Willem A Bemelman, Christy M Dunst, Steven A Edmundowicz, John C Lipham, James D Luketich, W Scott Melvin, Brant K Oelschlager, Steven C Schlack-Haerer, C Daniel Smith, Christopher C Smith, Dan Dunn, Paul A Taiganides |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 24% |
Saudi Arabia | 4 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
Mexico | 2 | 5% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 68% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 24% |
Scientists | 2 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Hungary | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Egypt | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 181 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 37 | 19% |
Other | 26 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 20 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
Other | 39 | 20% |
Unknown | 32 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 65% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 6% |
Unknown | 37 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#334,806
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#5,262
of 32,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,086
of 205,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#68
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.