You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deep brain stimulation restores frontostriatal network activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nn.3344 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martijn Figee, Judy Luigjes, Ruud Smolders, Carlos-Eduardo Valencia-Alfonso, Guido van Wingen, Bart de Kwaasteniet, Mariska Mantione, Pieter Ooms, Pelle de Koning, Nienke Vulink, Nina Levar, Lukas Droge, Pepijn van den Munckhof, P Richard Schuurman, Aart Nederveen, Wim van den Brink, Ali Mazaheri, Matthijs Vink, Damiaan Denys |
| Abstract |
Little is known about the underlying neural mechanism of deep brain stimulation (DBS). We found that DBS targeted at the nucleus accumbens (NAc) normalized NAc activity, reduced excessive connectivity between the NAc and prefrontal cortex, and decreased frontal low-frequency oscillations during symptom provocation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Our findings suggest that DBS is able to reduce maladaptive activity and connectivity of the stimulated region. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 11% |
| Japan | 3 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 526 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 7 | 1% |
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| China | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 491 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 112 | 21% |
| Researcher | 101 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 12% |
| Professor | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 96 | 18% |
| Unknown | 64 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 116 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 17% |
| Psychology | 75 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 14% |
| Engineering | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 9% |
| Unknown | 98 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 425. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#68,962
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#100
of 5,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#341
of 206,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#2
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.