↓ Skip to main content

Do Evidence-Based Interventions Work When Tested in the “Real World?” A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Parent Management Training for the Treatment of Child Disruptive Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Evidence-Based Interventions Work When Tested in the “Real World?” A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Parent Management Training for the Treatment of Child Disruptive Behavior
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10567-013-0128-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Michelson, Clare Davenport, Janine Dretzke, Jane Barlow, Crispin Day

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 233 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 16%
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Master 28 12%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 43 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 105 44%
Social Sciences 30 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 61 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,454,878
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#102
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,336
of 206,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them