You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nurse versus physician‐led care for the management of asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009296.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maarten C Kuethe, Anja A P H Vaessen‐Verberne, Roy G Elbers, Wim MC Van Aalderen |
| Abstract |
Asthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood and prevalence is also high in adulthood, thereby placing a considerable burden on healthcare resources. Therefore, effective asthma management is important to reduce morbidity and to optimise utilisation of healthcare facilities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 283 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 13% |
| Researcher | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 60 | 21% |
| Unknown | 93 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 23% |
| Psychology | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 99 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,848,758
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,977
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,271
of 205,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.