You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diabetic status and the relation of the three domains of glycemic control tomortality in critically ill patients: an international multicenter cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc12547 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James S Krinsley, Moritoki Egi, Alex Kiss, Amin N Devendra, Philipp Schuetz, Paula M Maurer, Marcus J Schultz, Roosmarijn TM van Hooijdonk, Morita Kiyoshi, Iain MJ Mackenzie, Djillali Annane, Peter Stow, Stanley A Nasraway, Sharon Holewinski, Ulrike Holzinger, Jean-Charles Preiser, Jean-Louis Vincent, Rinaldo Bellomo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 16% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 23% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,949,373
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,323
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,872
of 209,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#39
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.