You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exome sequencing identifies DYNC2H1 mutations as a common cause of asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy (Jeune syndrome) without major polydactyly, renal or retinal involvement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Genetics, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101284 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miriam Schmidts, Heleen H Arts, Ernie M H F Bongers, Zhimin Yap, Machteld M Oud, Dinu Antony, Lonneke Duijkers, Richard D Emes, Jim Stalker, Jan-Bart L Yntema, Vincent Plagnol, Alexander Hoischen, Christian Gilissen, Elisabeth Forsythe, Ekkehart Lausch, Joris A Veltman, Nel Roeleveld, Andrea Superti-Furga, Anna Kutkowska-Kazmierczak, Erik-Jan Kamsteeg, Nursel Elçioğlu, Merel C van Maarle, Luitgard M Graul-Neumann, Koenraad Devriendt, Sarah F Smithson, Diana Wellesley, Nienke E Verbeek, Raoul C M Hennekam, Hulya Kayserili, Peter J Scambler, Philip L Beales, Nine VAM Knoers, Ronald Roepman, Hannah M Mitchison |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 16% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#15,277,879
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#2,669
of 3,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,747
of 209,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#30
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.