↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian Estimation of Tobramycin Exposure in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bayesian Estimation of Tobramycin Exposure in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis
Published in
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2016
DOI 10.1128/aac.01131-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael A. Barras, David Serisier, Stefanie Hennig, Katrina Jess, Ross L. G. Norris

Abstract

Fixed tobramycin (mg/kg) dosing is often inappropriate in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) as pharmacokinetics are highly variable. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is an exposure metric suited to monitoring in this population. Bayesian strategies to estimate AUC have been available for over 20 years but are not standard practice in the clinical setting. To assess their suitability for use in clinical practice three AUC estimation methods using limited sampling were compared to measured true exposure using intensive sampling tobramycin data. Adults prescribed once daily intravenous tobramycin had eight concentrations taken over 24-hours. An estimate of true exposure within one dosing interval was calculated using the trapezoidal method and compared to three alternate estimates determined using a; 1) 2-sample log-linear regression (LLR) method (local hospital practice); 2) Bayesian estimate using 1-concentration (AUC1); 3) Bayesian estimate using 2-concentrations (AUC2). Each method was evaluated against the true measured exposure using a Bland-Altman analysis. Twelve patients were recruited with a median (range) age and weight of 25 (18-36) years and 66.5 (51-76) respectively. There was good agreement between the true exposure using intensive sampling using the traditional trapezoidal method and the three alternate estimates of AUC, with a mean AUC bias less than 10 mg/L.hr in each case; -8.2 (LLR), 3.8 (AUC1) and 1.0 (AUC2). All three methods may be suitable for use in the clinical setting, however a 1-sample Bayesian method may be most useful in ambulatory patients where coordinating blood samples is difficult. Bayesian based and LLR estimation methods of tobramycin AUC are equivalent to true exposure. However, Bayesian methods using 1-concentration may provide a more practical method. Suitably powered, randomised, clinical trials are required to assess patient outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 18%
Psychology 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,623,019
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
#2,795
of 15,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,934
of 323,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
#150
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.