↓ Skip to main content

Decision Aids for Patients Facing a Surgical Treatment Decision

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision Aids for Patients Facing a Surgical Treatment Decision
Published in
Annals of Surgery, May 2013
DOI 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182864fd6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anouk M. Knops, Dink A. Legemate, Astrid Goossens, Patrick M.M. Bossuyt, Dirk T. Ubbink

Abstract

To summarize the evidence available on the effects of decision aids in surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 138 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 38 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,636,167
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#1,041
of 9,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,023
of 204,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#6
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.