You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Drug Users in Amsterdam: Are They Still at Risk for HIV?
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0059125 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nienke van der Knaap, Bart P. X. Grady, Maarten F. Schim van der Loeff, Titia Heijman, Arjen Speksnijder, Ronald Geskus, Maria Prins |
Abstract |
To examine whether drug users (DU) in the Amsterdam Cohort Study (ACS) are still at risk for HIV, we studied trends in HIV incidence and injecting and sexual risk behaviour from 1986 to 2011. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 50% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 13% |
Singapore | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 25% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2013.
All research outputs
#6,674,205
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#83,764
of 202,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,283
of 217,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,679
of 5,429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.