↓ Skip to main content

Imaging volition: what the brain can tell us about the will

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 3,232)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging volition: what the brain can tell us about the will
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00221-013-3472-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Brass, Margaret T. Lynn, Jelle Demanet, Davide Rigoni

Abstract

The question of how we can voluntarily control our behaviour dates back to the beginnings of scientific psychology. Currently, there are two empirical research disciplines tackling human volition: cognitive neuroscience and social psychology. To date, there is little interaction between the two disciplines in terms of the investigation of human volition. The aim of the current article is to highlight recent brain imaging work on human volition and to relate social psychological concepts of volition to the functional neuroanatomy of intentional action. A host of studies indicate that the medial prefrontal cortex plays a crucial role in voluntary action. Accordingly, we postulate that social psychological concepts of volition can be investigated using neuroimaging techniques, and propose that by developing a social cognitive neuroscience of human volition, we may gain a deeper understanding of this fascinating and complex aspect of the human mind.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 4 2%
United States 3 2%
Australia 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 179 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 21%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 24 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 92 46%
Neuroscience 28 14%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 31 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2020.
All research outputs
#709,697
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#45
of 3,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,235
of 197,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.