↓ Skip to main content

Retinal vein occlusions: a review for the internist

Overview of attention for article published in Internal and Emergency Medicine, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retinal vein occlusions: a review for the internist
Published in
Internal and Emergency Medicine, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11739-010-0478-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rossella Marcucci, Francesco Sofi, Elisa Grifoni, Andrea Sodi, Domenico Prisco

Abstract

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a disease that is often associated with a variety of systemic disorders including arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and systemic vasculitis. There are various types of RVO, categorized on the basis of the site of occlusion and on the type of consequent vascular damage. Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is the most clinically relevant type of RVO. In addition to well-known classical risk factors, new thrombophilic factors have been investigated in patients with RVO. Data concerning a number of the parameters remain contradictory; yet, hyperhomocysteinemia and vitamins involved in methionine metabolism appear to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of this disease. Alterations in the fibrinolysis pathway (elevated levels of PAI-1 and Lipoprotein (a)), together with haemorheologic modifications have been recently consistently associated with the disease. Medical treatment includes identification and correction of vascular risk factors. In addition, LMWHs appear to be the best therapeutic approach even if based on a limited number of trials, conducted on a limited number of patients. No data are available on the possible role of antithrombotic strategies in the long-term prevention of recurrent RVO or vascular events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 39 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Engineering 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,357,371
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#216
of 984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,894
of 184,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Internal and Emergency Medicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.