↓ Skip to main content

Long‐term follow‐up study on patients with Miyoshi phenotype of distal muscular dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Neurology, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long‐term follow‐up study on patients with Miyoshi phenotype of distal muscular dystrophy
Published in
European Journal of Neurology, March 2013
DOI 10.1111/ene.12129
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. H. J. P. Linssen, W. G. de Voogt, M. Krahn, R. Bernard, N. Levy, J. H. J. Wokke, H. B. Ginjaar, M. de Visser

Abstract

To describe the long-term follow-up of a cohort of 22 patients with the Miyoshi phenotype of distal muscular dystrophy (MMD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Master 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Sports and Recreations 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2013.
All research outputs
#16,752,019
of 24,641,327 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Neurology
#2,647
of 3,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,767
of 201,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Neurology
#37
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,774 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.