↓ Skip to main content

Emotional facial expressions reduce neural adaptation to face identity

Overview of attention for article published in Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emotional facial expressions reduce neural adaptation to face identity
Published in
Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, May 2013
DOI 10.1093/scan/nst022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna M. V. Gerlicher, Anouk M. van Loon, H. Steven Scholte, Victor A. F. Lamme, Andries R. van der Leij

Abstract

In human social interactions, facial emotional expressions are a crucial source of information. Repeatedly presented information typically leads to an adaptation of neural responses. However, processing seems sustained with emotional facial expressions. Therefore, we tested whether sustained processing of emotional expressions, especially threat-related expressions, would attenuate neural adaptation. Neutral and emotional expressions (happy, mixed and fearful) of same and different identity were presented at 3 Hz. We used electroencephalography to record the evoked steady-state visual potentials (ssVEP) and tested to what extent the ssVEP amplitude adapts to the same when compared with different face identities. We found adaptation to the identity of a neutral face. However, for emotional faces, adaptation was reduced, decreasing linearly with negative valence, with the least adaptation to fearful expressions. This short and straightforward method may prove to be a valuable new tool in the study of emotional processing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 71 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 31%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 49%
Neuroscience 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,674,485
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#1,642
of 1,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,852
of 208,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#51
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.