↓ Skip to main content

Interaction of neuropeptide Y genotype and childhood emotional maltreatment on brain activity during emotional processing

Overview of attention for article published in Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interaction of neuropeptide Y genotype and childhood emotional maltreatment on brain activity during emotional processing
Published in
Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, March 2013
DOI 10.1093/scan/nst025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther M. Opmeer, Rudie Kortekaas, Marie-José van Tol, Nic J. A. van der Wee, Saskia Woudstra, Mark A. van Buchem, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx, Dick J. Veltman, André Aleman

Abstract

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been associated with stress reactivity in affective disorders and is most densely expressed in the amygdala. An important stressor associated with affective disorders is the experience of childhood emotional maltreatment (CEM). We investigated whether the interaction of NPY risk genotype and CEM would affect brain activation. From the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, 33 healthy controls and 85 patients with affective disorders were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while making gender decisions of emotional facial expressions. Results showed interactions between genotype and CEM, within carriers of the risk genotype, CEM was associated with higher amygdala activation, whereas CEM did not influence activation in non-risk carriers. In the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), less activation was seen in those with CEM and the risk genotype, whereas genotype did not influence PCC activation in those without CEM. In addition, those carrying the risk genotype and with experience of CEM made a faster gender decision than those without CEM. Thus, the combined effect of carrying NPY risk genotype and a history of CEM affected amygdala and PCC reactivity, areas related to emotion, self-relevance processing and autobiographical memory. These results are consistent with the notion that the combination of risk genotype and CEM may cause hypervigilance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 117 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 39%
Neuroscience 13 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 34 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#1,484
of 1,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,688
of 208,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#20
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.