↓ Skip to main content

Modafinil Modulates Resting-State Functional Network Connectivity and Cognitive Control in Alcohol-Dependent Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Psychiatry, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modafinil Modulates Resting-State Functional Network Connectivity and Cognitive Control in Alcohol-Dependent Patients
Published in
Biological Psychiatry, February 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.12.025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lianne Schmaal, Anna E. Goudriaan, Leen Joos, Anne Maren Krüse, Geert Dom, Wim van den Brink, Dick J. Veltman

Abstract

Chronic alcohol abuse is associated with deficits in cognitive control functions. Cognitive control is likely to be mediated through the interaction between intrinsic large-scale brain networks involved in externally oriented executive functioning and internally focused thought processing. Improving the interaction between these functional brain networks could be an important target for treatment. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the effects of the cognitive enhancer modafinil on within-network and between-network resting-state functional connectivity and cognitive control functions in alcohol-dependent patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 139 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 22%
Researcher 31 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 16%
Neuroscience 18 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 26 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2013.
All research outputs
#2,256,291
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychiatry
#1,412
of 6,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,185
of 294,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychiatry
#26
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.