↓ Skip to main content

Protective Mechanical Ventilation during General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery Improves Postoperative Pulmonary Function

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
407 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
347 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protective Mechanical Ventilation during General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery Improves Postoperative Pulmonary Function
Published in
Anesthesiology, June 2013
DOI 10.1097/aln.0b013e31829102de
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Severgnini, Gabriele Selmo, Christian Lanza, Alessandro Chiesa, Alice Frigerio, Alessandro Bacuzzi, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Raffaele Novario, Cesare Gregoretti, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Marcus J. Schultz, Samir Jaber, Emmanuel Futier, Maurizio Chiaranda, Paolo Pelosi

Abstract

The impact of intraoperative ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications is not defined. The authors aimed at determining the effectiveness of protective mechanical ventilation during open abdominal surgery on a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score as primary outcome and postoperative pulmonary function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 347 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 339 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 47 14%
Researcher 43 12%
Student > Postgraduate 37 11%
Student > Master 32 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 104 30%
Unknown 58 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 242 70%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 1%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 17 5%
Unknown 64 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2015.
All research outputs
#1,872,051
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#744
of 6,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,495
of 206,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#6
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.