↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic Choices and Clinical Outcomes in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians with Iron‐Deficiency Anemia in the Netherlands

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic Choices and Clinical Outcomes in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians with Iron‐Deficiency Anemia in the Netherlands
Published in
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, March 2013
DOI 10.1111/jgs.12168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marije E. Hamaker, Tessa Acampo, Jasper A. Remijn, Sebastiaan A.C. van Tuyl, Apollo Pronk, Edwin S. van der Zaag, Heleen A. Paling, Carolien H. Smorenburg, Sophia E. de Rooij, Barbara C. van Munster

Abstract

To evaluate current clinical practice for octogenarians with iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) by assessing referral patterns, diagnostic choices, clinical consequences of omission of endoscopy, and risks and benefits of IDA-related surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 71 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 20 27%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Unspecified 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,102,862
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#7,381
of 7,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,806
of 201,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#46
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.