↓ Skip to main content

Circumferential Balloon-based Radiofrequency Ablation of Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia Can Be Simplified, yet Efficacy Maintained, by Omitting the Cleaning Phase

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circumferential Balloon-based Radiofrequency Ablation of Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia Can Be Simplified, yet Efficacy Maintained, by Omitting the Cleaning Phase
Published in
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, December 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederike G.I. van Vilsteren, K. Nadine Phoa, Lorenza Alvarez Herrero, Roos E. Pouw, Carine M.T. Sondermeijer, Ineke van Lijnschoten, Kees A. Seldenrijk, Mike Visser, Sybren L. Meijer, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Bas L.A.M. Weusten, Erik J. Schoon, Jacques J.G.H.M. Bergman

Abstract

The current procedure for circumferential balloon-based radiofrequency ablation (c-RFA) for the removal of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) is labor intensive, comprising 2 ablation passes with a cleaning step to remove debris from the ablation zone and electrode. We compared the safety and efficacy of 3 different c-RFA ablation regimens.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Researcher 8 19%
Other 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 67%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#3,556
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,506
of 289,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
#35
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.