You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01585-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey D Sachs, Salim S Abdool Karim, Lara Aknin, Joseph Allen, Kirsten Brosbøl, Francesca Colombo, Gabriela Cuevas Barron, María Fernanda Espinosa, Vitor Gaspar, Alejandro Gaviria, Andy Haines, Peter J Hotez, Phoebe Koundouri, Felipe Larraín Bascuñán, Jong-Koo Lee, Muhammad Ali Pate, Gabriela Ramos, K Srinath Reddy, Ismail Serageldin, John Thwaites, Vaira Vike-Freiberga, Chen Wang, Miriam Khamadi Were, Lan Xue, Chandrika Bahadur, Maria Elena Bottazzi, Chris Bullen, George Laryea-Adjei, Yanis Ben Amor, Ozge Karadag, Guillaume Lafortune, Emma Torres, Lauren Barredo, Juliana G E Bartels, Neena Joshi, Margaret Hellard, Uyen Kim Huynh, Shweta Khandelwal, Jeffrey V Lazarus, Susan Michie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8,060 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 668 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 556 | 7% |
| Canada | 417 | 5% |
| Mexico | 249 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 228 | 3% |
| Spain | 184 | 2% |
| Australia | 169 | 2% |
| Germany | 147 | 2% |
| Japan | 112 | 1% |
| Other | 802 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4528 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7065 | 88% |
| Scientists | 491 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 340 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 155 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 533 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 110 | 21% |
| Unknown | 224 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 3% |
| Other | 107 | 20% |
| Unknown | 250 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6299. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#523
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#52
of 43,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17
of 434,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#2
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.