↓ Skip to main content

Transcription-mediated gene fusion in the human genome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Research, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcription-mediated gene fusion in the human genome
Published in
Genome Research, December 2005
DOI 10.1101/gr.4137606
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pinchas Akiva, Amir Toporik, Sarit Edelheit, Yifat Peretz, Alex Diber, Ronen Shemesh, Amit Novik, Rotem Sorek

Abstract

Transcription of a gene usually ends at a regulated termination point, preventing the RNA-polymerase from reading through the next gene. However, sporadic reports suggest that chimeric transcripts, formed by transcription of two consecutive genes into one RNA, can occur in human. The splicing and translation of such RNAs can lead to a new, fused protein, having domains from both original proteins. Here, we systematically identified over 200 cases of intergenic splicing in the human genome (involving 421 genes), and experimentally demonstrated that at least half of these fusions exist in human tissues. We showed that unique splicing patterns dominate the functional and regulatory nature of the resulting transcripts, and found intergenic distance bias in fused compared with nonfused genes. We demonstrate that the hundreds of fused genes we identified are only a subset of the actual number of fused genes in human. We describe a novel evolutionary mechanism where transcription-induced chimerism followed by retroposition results in a new, active fused gene. Finally, we provide evidence that transcription-induced chimerism can be a mechanism contributing to the evolution of protein complexes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Mexico 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 186 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 25%
Researcher 44 22%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 23%
Computer Science 10 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 36 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,982,774
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#1,485
of 4,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,823
of 169,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#10
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.