You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Avian influenza A H7N9 in Zhejiang, China
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60936-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marion Koopmans, Menno D de Jong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 27% |
Netherlands | 2 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 7% |
Argentina | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Kenya | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 54 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 24% |
Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 38% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,392,481
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#9,893
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,823
of 205,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#148
of 611 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 611 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.