You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association Between Variants of PRDM1 and NDP52 and Crohn's Disease, Based on Exome Sequencing and Functional Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastroenterology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Ellinghaus, Hu Zhang, Sebastian Zeissig, Simone Lipinski, Andreas Till, Tao Jiang, Björn Stade, Yana Bromberg, Eva Ellinghaus, Andreas Keller, Manuel A. Rivas, Jurgita Skieceviciene, Nadezhda T. Doncheva, Xiao Liu, Qing Liu, Fuman Jiang, Michael Forster, Gabriele Mayr, Mario Albrecht, Robert Häsler, Bernhard O. Boehm, Jane Goodall, Carlo R. Berzuini, James Lee, Vibeke Andersen, Ulla Vogel, Limas Kupcinskas, Manfred Kayser, Michael Krawczak, Susanna Nikolaus, Rinse K. Weersma, Cyriel Y. Ponsioen, Miquel Sans, Cisca Wijmenga, David P. Strachan, Wendy L. McArdle, Séverine Vermeire, Paul Rutgeerts, Jeremy D. Sanderson, Christopher G. Mathew, Morten H. Vatn, Jun Wang, Markus M. Nöthen, Richard H. Duerr, Carsten Büning, Stephan Brand, Jürgen Glas, Juliane Winkelmann, Thomas Illig, Anna Latiano, Vito Annese, Jonas Halfvarson, Mauro D'Amato, Mark J. Daly, Michael Nothnagel, Tom H. Karlsen, Suresh Subramani, Philip Rosenstiel, Stefan Schreiber, Miles Parkes, Andre Franke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 24% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2013.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#11,993
of 12,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,218
of 210,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#129
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.