You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transfusion-related acute lung injury: a clinical review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62197-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander PJ Vlaar, Nicole P Juffermans |
| Abstract |
Three decades ago, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) was considered a rare complication of transfusion medicine. Nowadays, the US Food and Drug Administration acknowledge the syndrome as the leading cause of transfusion-related mortality. Understanding of the pathogenesis of TRALI has resulted in the design of preventive strategies from a blood-bank perspective. A major breakthrough in efforts to reduce the incidence of TRALI has been to exclude female donors of products with high plasma volume, resulting in a decrease of roughly two-thirds in incidence. However, this strategy has not completely eradicated the complication. In the past few years, research has identified patient-related risk factors for the onset of TRALI, which have empowered physicians to take an individualised approach to patients who need transfusion. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 2 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 307 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 52 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 48 | 15% |
| Researcher | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 10% |
| Other | 75 | 23% |
| Unknown | 48 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 200 | 62% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Unknown | 60 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,746,399
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#11,492
of 42,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,869
of 205,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#184
of 612 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 612 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.