The ChEMBL database as linked open data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cheminformatics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 266)
  • High score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
29 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this scholarly content. Click here to find out more.
Title
The ChEMBL database as linked open data
Published in
Journal of Cheminformatics, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1758-2946-5-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Egon L Willighagen, Andra Waagmeester, Ola Spjuth, Peter Ansell, Antony J Williams, Valery Tkachenko, Janna Hastings, Bin Chen, David J Wild

Abstract

Making data available as Linked Data using Resource Description Framework (RDF) promotes integration with other web resources. RDF documents can natively link to related data, and others can link back using Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs). RDF makes the data machine-readable and uses extensible vocabularies for additional information, making it easier to scale up inference and data analysis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 6%
United States 4 6%
Germany 3 5%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Netherlands 2 3%
Japan 1 2%
China 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 46 70%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student (Master) 12 18%
Ph.D. Student 12 18%
Post Doc 8 12%
Student (Postgraduate) 6 9%
Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 22 33%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biological Sciences 26 39%
Computer and Information Science 19 29%
Chemistry 13 20%
Medicine 4 6%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 1 2%

Score in context

This research output has an Altmetric score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This score was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2015.
All research outputs
#89,754
of 4,658,403 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#4
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,608
of 89,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,658,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 89,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.