↓ Skip to main content

The ChEMBL database as linked open data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cheminformatics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 942)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
26 X users
patent
1 patent
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The ChEMBL database as linked open data
Published in
Journal of Cheminformatics, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1758-2946-5-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Egon L Willighagen, Andra Waagmeester, Ola Spjuth, Peter Ansell, Antony J Williams, Valery Tkachenko, Janna Hastings, Bin Chen, David J Wild

Abstract

Making data available as Linked Data using Resource Description Framework (RDF) promotes integration with other web resources. RDF documents can natively link to related data, and others can link back using Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs). RDF makes the data machine-readable and uses extensible vocabularies for additional information, making it easier to scale up inference and data analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Brazil 5 3%
Germany 3 2%
Netherlands 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 132 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 21%
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Master 26 17%
Other 12 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 35 23%
Computer Science 33 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 27 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#903,666
of 25,079,131 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#23
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,512
of 198,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.