↓ Skip to main content

RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre Annual Report 2014–2015: disparities in presentations to primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre Annual Report 2014–2015: disparities in presentations to primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2016
DOI 10.3399/bjgp16x688573
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon de Lusignan, Ana Correa, Sameera Pathirannehelage, Rachel Byford, Ivelina Yonova, Alex J Elliot, Theresa Lamagni, Gayatri Amirthalingam, Richard Pebody, Gillian Smith, Simon Jones, Imran Rafi

Abstract

The Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) comprises over 100 general practices in England, with a population of around 1 million, providing a public health surveillance system for England and data for research. To demonstrate the scope of data with the RCGP Annual Report 2014-2015 (May 2014 to April 2015) by describing disparities in the presentation of six common conditions included in the report. This is a report of respiratory and communicable disease incidence from a primary care sentinel network in England. Incidence rates and demographic profiles are described for common cold, acute otitis media, pneumonia, influenza-like illness, herpes zoster, and scarlet fever. The impact of age, sex, ethnicity, and deprivation on the diagnosis of each condition is explored using a multivariate logistic regression. With the exception of herpes zoster, all conditions followed a seasonal pattern. Apart from pneumonia and scarlet fever, the odds of presenting with any of the selected conditions were greater for females (P<0.001). Older people had a greater probability of a pneumonia diagnosis (≥75 years, odds ratio [OR] 6.37; P<0.001). Common cold and influenza-like illness were more likely in people from ethnic minorities than white people, while the converse was true for acute otitis media and herpes zoster. There were higher odds of acute otitis media and herpes zoster diagnosis among the less deprived (least deprived quintile, OR 1.32 and 1.48, respectively; P<0.001). The RCGP RSC database provides insight into the content and range of GP workload and provides insight into current public health concerns. Further research is needed to explore these disparities in presentation to primary care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,251,146
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,359
of 4,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,081
of 420,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#48
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.