↓ Skip to main content

Response to Evidence-Basis for Anticoagulants for Cerebral Sinus Venous Thrombosis?

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response to Evidence-Basis for Anticoagulants for Cerebral Sinus Venous Thrombosis?
Published in
Stroke, June 2013
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.113.001003
Authors

Jonathan M. Coutinho, Marie-Germaine Bousser, Jan Stam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 67%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2013.
All research outputs
#18,339,860
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#10,273
of 11,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,360
of 194,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#141
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.