↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the Therapist Contribution to Psychotherapy Outcome: A Meta-Analytic Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 728)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
145 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the Therapist Contribution to Psychotherapy Outcome: A Meta-Analytic Approach
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10488-016-0783-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J. King, Jayne A. Orr, Brooke Poulsen, S. Giac Giacomantonio, Catherine Haden

Abstract

Understanding the role that therapists play in psychotherapy outcome, and the contribution to outcome made by individual therapist differences has implications for service delivery and training of therapists. In this study we used a novel approach to estimate the magnitude of the therapist contribution overall and the effect of individual therapist differences. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies in which participants were randomised to receive the same treatment either through self-help or through a therapist. We identified a total of 15 studies (commencement N = 910; completion N = 723) meeting inclusion criteria. We found no difference in treatment completion rate and broad equivalence of treatment outcomes for participants treated through self-help and participants treated through a therapist. Also, contrary to our expectations, we found that the variability of outcomes was broadly equivalent, suggesting that differences in efficacy of individual therapists were not sufficient to make therapy outcomes more variable when a therapist was involved. Overall, the findings suggest that self-help, with minimal therapist input, has considerable potential as a first-line intervention. The findings did not suggest that individual differences between therapists play a major role in psychotherapy outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 45%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#260,906
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#11
of 728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,355
of 424,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.