↓ Skip to main content

Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004982.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcello Di Nisio, Iris M Wichers, Saskia Middeldorp

Abstract

The optimal treatment of superficial thrombophlebitis (ST) of the legs remains poorly defined. While improving or relieving the local painful symptoms, treatment should aim at preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), which might complicate the natural history of ST. This is the second update of a review first published in 2007.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
France 1 1%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 93 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Other 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,393,100
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,856
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,555
of 204,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.