You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A systematic review of the relationship between patient mix and learning in work-based clinical settings. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 24
|
---|---|
Published in |
Medical Teacher, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.3109/0142159x.2013.797570 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jip de Jong, Mechteld Visser, Nynke Van Dijk, Cees van der Vleuten, Margreet Wieringa-de Waard |
Abstract |
Clinical workplace-based learning has been the means to becoming a medical professional for many years. The importance of an adequate patient mix, as defined by the number of patients and the types of medical problems, for an optimal learning process is based on educational theory and recognised by national and international accreditation standards. The relationship between patient mix and learning in work-based curricula as yet remains unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 114 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
Researcher | 13 | 11% |
Professor | 13 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 41 | 34% |
Unknown | 17 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 45% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
Psychology | 8 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,831,097
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from Medical Teacher
#918
of 2,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,153
of 200,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Teacher
#20
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.