↓ Skip to main content

Amphetamine Abuse in Sweden

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amphetamine Abuse in Sweden
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, April 2013
DOI 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3182870310
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan Wayne Jones, Anita Holmgren

Abstract

Amphetamine is a major drug of abuse in Sweden and in the other Nordic countries. The demographics of amphetamine abusers in Sweden and the concentrations of this stimulant in blood are reported for 10 years of forensic blood samples (2001-2010). Using a forensic toxicology database (TOXBASE), we studied 1183 amphetamine-related deaths, 20,452 users of illicit drugs, and 47,366 people arrested for driving under the influence of drugs (DUID). Most amphetamine abusers were male (82%-87%), and their average age was 33 to 39 years with males being 2 to 3 years older than females (P < 0.001). Mean (median) concentrations of amphetamine in blood were 1.25 (0.40) mg/L in autopsy cases, 0.61 (0.40) mg/L in users of illicit drugs, and 0.76 (0.58) mg/L in DUID suspects. Median concentration in DUID suspects was significantly higher than in the other forensic materials (P < 0.001). Women also had higher median concentrations of amphetamine in blood than male abusers of this central stimulant (P < 0.001). The major coingested drugs were benzodiazepines (41%), cannabis (26%), opiates (21%), and alcohol (18%) in autopsy cases. Polydrug use was less common in DUID suspects and users of illicit drugs, although benzodiazepines (13%), tetrahydrocannabinol (12%), and opiates (5%) were often identified along with amphetamine. Because median concentration of amphetamine was higher in living subjects (DUID suspects) compared with amphetamine-related deaths, this points toward toxicity of coingested drugs or adverse drug-drug interaction as being responsible for death.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Psychology 4 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,778,510
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
#752
of 3,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,790
of 212,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.