You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Strategies for Intravenous Fluid Resuscitation in Trauma Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-016-3865-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Wise, Michael Faurie, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain, Eric Hodgson |
| Abstract |
Intravenous fluid management of trauma patients is fraught with complex decisions that are often complicated by coagulopathy and blood loss. This review discusses the fluid management in trauma patients from the perspective of the developing world. In addition, the article describes an approach to specific circumstances in trauma fluid decision-making and provides recommendations for the resource-limited environment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 158 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 9% |
| United States | 10 | 6% |
| Argentina | 10 | 6% |
| Canada | 10 | 6% |
| Spain | 9 | 6% |
| Mexico | 5 | 3% |
| Russia | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 23% |
| Unknown | 55 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 34 | 22% |
| Scientists | 15 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 7% |
| Researcher | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 16% |
| Unknown | 69 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 18% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 78 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2021.
All research outputs
#360,552
of 25,362,278 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#26
of 4,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,646
of 421,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#2
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.