You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of Antenatal Clinics to Deliver Intermittent Preventive Treatment and Insecticide Treated Nets for the Control of Malaria in Pregnancy in Kenya
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0064913 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jenny Hill, Stephanie Dellicour, Jane Bruce, Peter Ouma, James Smedley, Peter Otieno, Maurice Ombock, Simon Kariuki, Meghna Desai, Mary J. Hamel, Feiko O. ter Kuile, Jayne Webster |
Abstract |
Malaria in pregnancy can have devastating consequences for mother and baby. Coverage with the WHO prevention strategy for sub-Saharan Africa of intermittent-preventive-treatment (IPTp) with two doses of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and insecticide-treated-nets (ITNs) in pregnancy is low. We analysed household survey data to evaluate the effectiveness of antenatal clinics (ANC) to deliver IPTp and ITNs to pregnant women in Nyando district, Kenya. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 212 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 71 | 33% |
Researcher | 28 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
Other | 33 | 15% |
Unknown | 36 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 30 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
Other | 24 | 11% |
Unknown | 43 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2013.
All research outputs
#19,162,324
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#163,283
of 210,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,594
of 202,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,476
of 4,667 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,667 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.