↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Antenatal Clinics to Deliver Intermittent Preventive Treatment and Insecticide Treated Nets for the Control of Malaria in Pregnancy in Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of Antenatal Clinics to Deliver Intermittent Preventive Treatment and Insecticide Treated Nets for the Control of Malaria in Pregnancy in Kenya
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0064913
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny Hill, Stephanie Dellicour, Jane Bruce, Peter Ouma, James Smedley, Peter Otieno, Maurice Ombock, Simon Kariuki, Meghna Desai, Mary J. Hamel, Feiko O. ter Kuile, Jayne Webster

Abstract

Malaria in pregnancy can have devastating consequences for mother and baby. Coverage with the WHO prevention strategy for sub-Saharan Africa of intermittent-preventive-treatment (IPTp) with two doses of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and insecticide-treated-nets (ITNs) in pregnancy is low. We analysed household survey data to evaluate the effectiveness of antenatal clinics (ANC) to deliver IPTp and ITNs to pregnant women in Nyando district, Kenya.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 212 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 33%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 15%
Social Sciences 30 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 43 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2013.
All research outputs
#19,162,324
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#163,283
of 210,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,594
of 202,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,476
of 4,667 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,667 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.