↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Coronary Microvascular Function on Long-term Cardiac Mortality in Patients With Acute ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Coronary Microvascular Function on Long-term Cardiac Mortality in Patients With Acute ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published in
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, June 2013
DOI 10.1161/circinterventions.112.000168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim P. van de Hoef, Matthijs Bax, Martijn Meuwissen, Peter Damman, Ronak Delewi, Robbert J. de Winter, Karel T. Koch, Carl Schotborgh, José P.S. Henriques, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Jan J. Piek

Abstract

Microvascular function is increasingly being recognized as an important marker of risk in coronary artery disease, and may be accurately assessed by intracoronary Doppler flow velocity measurements. In the setting of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction there are limited data regarding the prognostic value of microvascular function in both infarct-related and reference coronary arteries for long-term clinical outcome. We sought to determine the prognostic value of microvascular function, as assessed by Doppler flow velocity measurements, for cardiac mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Researcher 10 16%
Other 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
#1,238
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,822
of 209,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.