↓ Skip to main content

Listeria monocytogenes Sequence Type 6 and Increased Rate of Unfavorable Outcome in Meningitis: Epidemiologic Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Listeria monocytogenes Sequence Type 6 and Increased Rate of Unfavorable Outcome in Meningitis: Epidemiologic Cohort Study
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, April 2013
DOI 10.1093/cid/cit250
Pubmed ID
Authors

Merel M. Koopmans, Matthijs C. Brouwer, Merijn W. Bijlsma, Sandra Bovenkerk, Wendy Keijzers, Arie van der Ende, Diederik van de Beek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#9,398
of 17,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,212
of 197,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#88
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.