↓ Skip to main content

Can you diagnose for vertebral fracture correctly by plain X-ray?

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can you diagnose for vertebral fracture correctly by plain X-ray?
Published in
Osteoporosis International, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00198-006-0123-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Z. Ito, A. Harada, Y. Matsui, M. Takemura, N. Wakao, T. Suzuki, T. Nihashi, S. Kawatsu, H. Shimokata, N. Ishiguro

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,377
of 3,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,080
of 66,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.