You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawn Stacey, Krystina B Lewis, Maureen Smith, Meg Carley, Robert Volk, Elisa E Douglas, Lissa Pacheco-Brousseau, Jeanette Finderup, Janet Gunderson, Michael J Barry, Carol L Bennett, Paulina Bravo, Karina Steffensen, Amédé Gogovor, Ian D Graham, Shannon E Kelly, France Légaré, Henning Sondergaard, Richard Thomson, Logan Trenaman, Lyndal Trevena |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 315 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 89 | 27% |
| Unknown | 69 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 25 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 7% |
| Psychology | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 80 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#456,836
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#777
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,788
of 350,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.