↓ Skip to main content

Effect of a nurse-coordinated prevention programme on cardiovascular risk after an acute coronary syndrome: main results of the RESPONSE randomised trial

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of a nurse-coordinated prevention programme on cardiovascular risk after an acute coronary syndrome: main results of the RESPONSE randomised trial
Published in
Heart, June 2013
DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303989
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harald T Jorstad, Clemens von Birgelen, A Marco W Alings, Anho Liem, Jan Melle van Dantzig, Wybren Jaarsma, Dirk J A Lok, Hans J A Kragten, Keesjan de Vries, Paul A R de Milliano, Adrie J A M Withagen, Wilma J M Scholte op Reimer, Jan G P Tijssen, Ron J G Peters

Abstract

To quantify the impact of a practical, hospital-based nurse-coordinated prevention programme on cardiovascular risk, integrated into the routine clinical care of patients discharged after an acute coronary syndrome, as compared with usual care only.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 184 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Researcher 10 5%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 52 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 20%
Psychology 11 6%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 59 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,122,575
of 22,713,403 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#2,398
of 5,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,673
of 195,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#28
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,713,403 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.