↓ Skip to main content

Impact of intravenous abatacept on synovitis, osteitis and structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: the ASSET randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of intravenous abatacept on synovitis, osteitis and structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: the ASSET randomised controlled trial
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, August 2012
DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201611
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip G Conaghan, Patrick Durez, Rieke E Alten, Gerd-Rüdiger Burmester, Paul P Tak, Lars Klareskog, Anca Irinel Catrina, Julie DiCarlo, Corine Gaillez, Manuela Le Bars, Xianhuang Zhou, Charles Peterfy

Abstract

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study evaluated the impact of abatacept on MRI pathology as a primary outcome in methotrexate (MTX)-refractory patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Other 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,202,008
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#2,258
of 7,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,806
of 169,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#19
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.