You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What Outcomes Matter to Patients?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2001
|
DOI | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00354.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cathy Donald Sherbourne, Roland Sturm, Kenneth B. Wells |
Abstract |
This study estimates the relative value to patients of physical, mental, and social health when making treatment decisions. Despite recommendations to use patient preferences to guide treatment decisions, little is known about how patients value different dimensions of their health status. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 50% |
Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 5% |
United States | 2 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 21% |
Researcher | 10 | 16% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 21% |
Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 39% |
Psychology | 9 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,946
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,307
of 131,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#102
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.