You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tetrahydrobiopterin responsiveness in phenylketonuria: prediction with the 48-hour loading test and genotype
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-8-103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen Anjema, Margreet van Rijn, Floris C Hofstede, Annet M Bosch, Carla EM Hollak, Estela Rubio-Gozalbo, Maaike C de Vries, Mirian CH Janssen, Carolien CA Boelen, Johannes GM Burgerhof, Nenad Blau, M Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema, Francjan J van Spronsen |
| Abstract |
How to efficiently diagnose tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) responsiveness in patients with phenylketonuria remains unclear. This study investigated the positive predictive value (PPV) of the 48-hour BH4 loading test and the additional value of genotype. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2015.
All research outputs
#16,919,456
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,983
of 3,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,821
of 206,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#26
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.