You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The hearing voices network: initial lessons and future directions for mental health professionals and Systems of Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychiatric Quarterly, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11126-017-9491-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Styron, Lauren Utter, Larry Davidson |
| Abstract |
For more than two decades, the Hearing Voices Network (HVN) has provided alternative approaches to supporting voice hearers, and an emerging body of research is now confirming their value. HVN approaches present unique opportunities and challenges for mental health professionals and systems of care that work with individuals who hear voices. An overview of the HVN is presented, including its history, principles and approaches. HVN approaches are compared and contrasted with traditional mental health treatments. HVN's potential contribution to the transformation of mental health care is discussed. Directions for future research are presented. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 27 | 43% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,336,491
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatric Quarterly
#144
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,641
of 432,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatric Quarterly
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.