You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Explicit attention interferes with selective emotion processing in human extrastriate cortex
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-8-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harald T Schupp, Jessica Stockburger, Florian Bublatzky, Markus Junghöfer, Almut I Weike, Alfons O Hamm |
| Abstract |
Brain imaging and event-related potential studies provide strong evidence that emotional stimuli guide selective attention in visual processing. A reflection of the emotional attention capture is the increased Early Posterior Negativity (EPN) for pleasant and unpleasant compared to neutral images (approximately 150-300 ms poststimulus). The present study explored whether this early emotion discrimination reflects an automatic phenomenon or is subject to interference by competing processing demands. Thus, emotional processing was assessed while participants performed a concurrent feature-based attention task varying in processing demands. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 139 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 23% |
| Researcher | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 79 | 51% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,274,524
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#704
of 1,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,408
of 76,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.